Londra vissuta dagli Italiani ...

Rassegna stampa

Ordine pubblico

Un giudice britannico ha assolto quattro musulmani, tre ragazze ed un loro cugino, nonostante avessero brutalmente “pestato” una ragazza che nulla aveva fatto loro. Il giudice, in sostanza, ha sentenziato che erano incapaci di intendere e di volere temporaneamente (noi diremmo che erano in stato di incapacità naturale), in quanto, essendo musulmani, non erano abituati ai fumi dell’alcol. Vi riportiamo alcuni stralci tratti da alcuni quotidiani, in modo da rendervi meglio edotti sull’accaduto:


"A gang of Muslim women who attacked a passer-by in a city centre walked free from court after a judge heard they were ‘not used to being drunk’ because of their religion. The group – three sisters and a cousin – allegedly screamed ‘kill the white slag’ as they set upon Rhea Page as she waited for a taxi with her boyfriend. Miss Page, 22, was left with a bald patch where her hair was pulled out in the attack and was left ‘black and blue’ after suffering a flurry of kicks to the head, back, arms and legs while motionless on the pavement. Ambaro Maxamed, 24, students Ayan Maxamed, 28, and Hibo Maxamed, 24, and their 28-year-old cousin Ifrah Nur each admitted actual bodily harm, which carries a maximum sentence of five years’ imprisonment. But Judge Robert Brown gave them suspended jail terms after hearing mitigation that as Muslims, the women were not used to being drunk. The Koran prohibits Muslims from consuming alcohol, although Islamic teachings permit its use for medicinal purposes. After the sentencing, Ambaro Maxamed wrote on her Twitter account: ‘Happy happy happy!’, ‘I’m so going out’, and ‘Today has been such a great day’. Yesterday Miss Page, a care worker, called the sentence ‘disgusting’ and said the gang deserved ‘immediate custody’. ‘It’s no punishment at all,’ she said. ‘And for them to say they did it because they were not used to alcohol is no excuse. If they were not supposed to be drinking then they shouldn’t have been out in bars at that time of night. ‘Even after the police came and they all ran away, one of them came running back to kick me in the head one last time. ‘I honestly think they attacked me just because I am white. I can’t think of any other reason.’ Miss Page was treated for bruises and grazes after the attack in June last year as she walked to a taxi rank with boyfriend Lewis Moore, 23, in Leicester city centre. At the time she worked caring for people with autism and learning difficulties but gave up the job after repeated absences because of stress and flashbacks. She is still having counselling and suffers panic attacks. She said: ‘We were just minding our own business but they kept shouting “white bitch” and “white slag” at me. When I turned around one of them grabbed my hair then threw me on the ground.‘They were taking turns to kick me over and over. I thought they were going to kill me.’"


"Sisters Ambaro Maxamed, 24, Ayan Maxamed, 28, and Hibo Maxamed, 24, and their cousin Ifrah Nur, 28, admitted causing Rhea Page actual bodily harm – a charge which can carry a five-year jail sentence. However, while Judge Robert Brown acknowledged the attack was ‘ugly’, he handed the group suspended sentences after hearing that, being Muslim, they were not used to drinking. Ms Page said her assailants screamed ‘kill the white slag’ while kicking her in the head as her boyfriend Lewis Moore, 23, tried to fight them off after a night out in Leicester in June last year. ‘They were taking turns to kick me. I was lying on the ground the whole time, crying and screaming. It was terrifying. I thought they were going to kill me.’ She suffered bruises and grazes to her head, back, legs and arms, and had clumps of hair pulled out, Leicester crown court heard. The 22-year-old, who was left so traumatised she lost her job due to repeated absences with stress, labelled the sentence ‘disgusting’. Mr Moore was accused of using ‘violence’ to restrain the attackers but even Gary Short, mitigating for Ambaro Mazamad, said ‘it doesn’t justify their behaviour’. ‘They’re Somalian Muslims and alcohol or drugs isn’t something they’re used to,’ he added. As well as their six-month sentences, suspended for a year, Hibo Maxamed received a four-month curfew between 9pm and 6am, while the others were ordered to carry out 150 hours of unpaid work."


i am a Muslim residing in the UK and seeing and hearing this disgusting incident i would say to anyone who want to know that this has nothing to do with Islam and the judge shouldn’t give these hooligans any chance to see day light again.
- Ahmed, uk (midlands), 08/12/2011 19:36 (www.dailymail.co.uk)

- kelly, swindon, 08/12/2011 13:55 (www.dailymail.co.uk)

Disgusted by the video i have just watched!! Fairplay to Rhea’s boyfriend who tried to defend her! These aren’t even stupid teenage girls who done this they are in their 20’s and old enough to know better (not that age is an exuse either)! And i agree if that was a gang of white girls that jumped a somalian muslim girl AND got off as lightly on the premise that they just couldn’t take their beer.... There would be OUTRAGE!!!! As the mother of an 11yr old i genuinley fear for her and the society that she has to grow up in and the message that our unfair justice system is sending out! Rhea should be able to appeal against the soft sentance that her attackers were given.
- Lee-Anne, Northampton, 08/12/2011 13:52 (www.dailymail.co.uk)

Why were they drunk? Alcohol is forbidden to Muslims, isn’t it? Why not insist that their Religious Leaders deal with them according to their Muslim laws. I know the laws would not care that they attacked an “infidel” but it should care that they flouted the constrictions on alcohol. I am not from Great Britain but it seems to me that the judge handing down this sentence should be removed for failure to protect the citizens of his juristiction. The women need to provide some type of restitution. Drunken behavior should not be an excuse for causing bodily harm to another person. Breaking a window, maybe the suspended sentence would be appropriate.
- Byrrni, Ohio, USA, 08/12/2011 13:11 (www.dailymail.co.uk)

I’m Indian and experienced racism my entire life. This is a load of rubbish from the judge! Was the judge afraid of some backlash from the muslim community? was he just chicken to hand out a jail sentence? The judge’s decision has openly advocated any muslim to commit any crime under the influence of alcohol and guarantee no sentence as long as they swear blind they are not used to drinking alcohol since it is against their religion. I know plenty of muslims who drink alcohol. How can the judge prove these girls have never had alcohol before? The judge’s decision should be based on fact and the incident. Four girls attacked one girl and shouted racist abuse. The End. Sentencing should not take into account whether the attackers are black, white, drunk, sober, thin, tall, fat, short or even dressed as a chicken! The law in this country is pathetic and never supports victims.
- Tony, Birmingham, UK, 08/12/2011 13:10 (www.dailymail.co.uk)

This is fcking disgusting. The law clearly states that no matter if you are drunk or not, you are responsible for you own fcking actions. Also, using religion as an excuse for criminal activities is pathetic. The women should be jailed for 5 years, and the judge should be dismissed for perversion of justice.
- AndyAndy (www.metro.co.uk)

These people really don’t know how to behave in a civilised society. It’s not surprising considering their country has been in a state of perpetual anarchy for the past 15 years yet I really don’t see why that has to be our problem. Send these four back. I don’t see what good they’re doing us.
- TimBusan (www.metro.co.uk)

Rassegna stampa

© Copyright | Mappa | Legale | info@italianialondra.it